Daniel Stutzbach <dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com> added the comment:
Well, I grant you that it's a bit of scope-creep, and if you want to reject it on those grounds I can't blame you. To me it seems like a relatively small change that would greatly help people like myself who want to update older code so that it will run under 2.6, 2.7, and 3.1+. Of course, since I don't know how to make the change, I could also be wrong about how easy it would be for a knowledgeable person to fit it into the existing 2to3 framework. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7141> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
