anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> added the comment: I still haven't received answers on the licensing questions in developer's mailing list. After the amount of negative feedback received I decided not to continue. But I am still interested in constructive discussion to get satisfying and full answers to the questions I've asked. You should understand that I can not sign agreements which terms are not clear to me, or if I think that other party fails to fulfill the conditions.
I see the contributor's agreement text is changed again, but there is no history of changes, and no electronic signature, and looking through the text I still can't find it to be clear. As for this patch - I hereby release it into public domain, or if copyright law in your country doesn't allow that - I hereby grant you the right to use it on the terms of ISC license or WTFP license. If you still can't use the patch and can't explain me why the paragraph above is not enough, it is still possible to resolve the situation if you have some contacts at Google. I can submit my patch to Google and they'll send it to you. This will work, because I've signed http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html But this won't work if they didn't sign your form, of course. P.S. I want to see Python more open for contributions as well as you, but with more attention to details. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9272> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
