Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > One other thought. If there is a perceived need, I would rather an > alternate approach that unifies a language a bit by letting range() > expose its arguments as a slice and modify its input to accept a slice.
This sounds like an obscure complication to me. A range is not a slice and I don't see the point of trying to bridge both concepts. It is even more YAGNI than the original request. ---------- nosy: +pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9896> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
