Case Van Horsen <cas...@gmail.com> added the comment: The patch does not address that "unsigned long" is still used to calculate the hash values. This breaks numeric hashing and leads to incorrect values.
Python 3.2a3+ (py3k, Oct 17 2010, 19:03:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import sys >>> sys.hash_info sys.hash_info(width=64, modulus=-1, inf=314159, nan=0, imag=1000003) >>> Would "size_t" be the appropriate type to use? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9778> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
