Eric Smith <e...@trueblade.com> added the comment: +1
I agree on removing the lowercase versions. It's sort of handy having them around to prevent accidental uses. But the same could be said for other similar macros/functions. Plus they wouldn't work if the isXXX symbols were really functions, not macros (not that I know if that's even allowed by the standard). The patch looks okay to me, although I didn't actually compile and run the tests. You'll find out soon enough! The issue number in the NEWS entry needs to be fixed, of course. Thanks for doing this, Dave. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10288> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
