Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> I'd be inclined to insert a check that falls back > to the "unorderable_list_difference" approach in > the case where "expected != sorted(reversed(expected))". Too fragile and subtle. The method need to be absolutely straight-forward. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10242> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
