Lukas Lueg <lukas.l...@gmail.com> added the comment: Thanks for your comment; it is a very valid point to consider. However, as a vector-based implementation is roughly three to four times faster than what the current API can provide by design (reduced overhead and GIL-relaxation not included), I may disagree with it.
I'm willing to make a proposal (read: patch) if you and the other overlords have enough confidence in this API-change and it has a chance to get submitted. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10302> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com