Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment: This stuff is hard to write automated tests for, hence there are none.
The patch is mostly straightforward: capture errno with new variable err at point of possible error when intervening calculation is needed before testing the value of errno. This seems like a good idea. There is one relocation of memory freeing and the additions of + if (res >= 0) + break; which I cannot evaluate. ---------- nosy: +terry.reedy stage: -> patch review _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10350> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
