Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > > I consider this a bug (which is why I added Python 2.7 to the list > of versions), since those code points need to be mapped to decimal > and digit as well (see the references I posted; and compare ). > I don't disagree. However using Unicode 5.2.0 instead of the latest 6.0.0 may be considered a bug as well. The practical issue is whether to maintain two separate versions of Tools/unicode for 3.x and 2.7 or merge 3.x changes back to 2.7 and support 3.x using 2to3. Another option is to simply use only 2.7 (or only 3.x) with Tools/unicode and maintain control the differences between 2.7 and 3.x using a command line switch. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10575> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
