Daniel Stutzbach <stutzb...@google.com> added the comment: Raymond,
Do you have around 10 minutes today to look at the patch I submitted in Issue 8743? It appears to solve both this issue and that one, which have priorities critical and high, respectively. It's a reasonably small patch: around 20 lines changed plus 20 lines added, all Python code. Here's a direct link: http://bugs.python.org/file20045/set-with-Set.patch If it looks good to you, I'd like to commit it in time for 3.2b2 so that it gets as much exercise as possible before 3.2-final. Earlier you had expressed that adding the __rand__ methods to collections.Set would be tricky issue, so I'm concerned that I have overlooked something important and obvious. (Feedback from others is, of course, welcome as well) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2226> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
