Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > I would like to see this reopened: we have a very large class of > users that are not ready to entirely port to 64-bit and need this > now.
And I remain -1 to such requests. You can appeal to that by writing a PEP, or finding a committer who is willing to make this change. Alternatively, just provide these users with binaries that you built yourself, or hire somebody to build such binaries for you. > I understand that yes, applications still cannot allocate more > CONTIGUOUS memory, but this is not a regression if it continues to be > so. It would be a regression if Python started crashing because of that change, which is my concern. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1449496> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
