Georg Brandl <ge...@python.org> added the comment: The patch is wrong: it hardcodes the number of characters that the time string has, but it can be more than 24 if the year is > 9999. (Of course, the check for \n currently in the code is wrong too and must be fixed.)
Also, shouldn't the issue be handled as in ctime()? There is a NULL check there, and by just doing that check we wouldn't depend on asctime_r(). ---------- assignee: -> belopolsky nosy: +belopolsky, georg.brandl _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8013> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
