Glenn Linderman <v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com> added the comment:
David, Starting from a working (but hacked to work) version of http.server and
using 3.2a1 (I should upgrade to the Beta, but I doubt it makes a difference at
the moment), I modified
# if hasattr( sys.stdin, 'buffer'):
# sys.stdin = sys.stdin.buffer
sys.stdin = sys.stdin.detach()
and it all kept working.
Then I took out the
try: # Windows needs stdio set for binary mode.
import msvcrt
msvcrt.setmode (0, os.O_BINARY) # stdin = 0
msvcrt.setmode (1, os.O_BINARY) # stdout = 1
msvcrt.setmode (2, os.O_BINARY) # stderr = 2
except ImportError:
pass
and it quit working. Seems that \r\r\n\r\r\n is not recognized by Firefox as
the "end of the headers" delimiter.
Whether this is a bug in IO or not, I can't say for sure. It does seem,
though, that
1) If Python is fully replacing the IO layers, which in 3.x it seems to claim
to, then it should fully replace them, building on a binary byte stream, not a
"binary byte stream with replacement of \n by \r\n". The Windows hack above
replaces, for stdin, stdout, and stderr, a "binary byte stream with replacement
of \n by \r\n" with a binary byte stream. Seems like Python should do that, on
Windows, so that it has a chance of actually knowing/controlling what gets
generated. Perhaps it does, if started with "-u", but starting with "-u"
should not be a requirement for a properly functioning program. Alternately,
the IO streams could understand, and toggle the os.O_BINARY flag, but that
seems like it would require more platform-specific code than simply opening all
Windows files (and adjusting preopened Windows files) during initialization.
2) The weird CGI processing that exists in the released version of http.server
seems to cover up this problem, partly because it isn't very functional, claims
"alternate semantics" (read: non-standard semantics), and invokes Python with
-u when it does do so. It is so non-standard that it isn't clear what should
or should not be happening. But the CGI scripts I am running, that pass or
fail as above, also run on Windows 2.6, and particularly, Unix 2.6, in an
Apache environment. So I have been trying to minimize the differences to
startup code, rather than add platform-specific tweaks throughout the CGI
scripts.
That said, it clearly could be my environment, but I've debugged enough
different versions of things to think that the Windows hack above is required
on both 2.x and 3.x to ensure proper bytestreams.... and others must think so
too, because I found the code by searching on Google, not because I learned
enough Python internals to figure it out on my own. The question I'm
attempting to address here, is only that 3.x still needs the same hack that 2.x
needs, on Windows, to create bytestreams.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4953>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
