Charles-Francois Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: > have changed title of the bug. This is more precisely describe the problem
Yes, its's not quite the same problem. > I think, that flush() should be no-op if mapping is read-only. This has already be done for py3k. See http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/py3k/Modules/mmapmodule.c?r1=84950&r2=85678 Note that you shouldn't be calling flush in the first place... ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10867> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
