Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > It could be argued that this is incorrect, as it masks under-reads of > stdin by the subprocess. However I believe a sanely-written subprocess > ought to indicate success/failure back with its return code.
It seems quite orthogonal. The subprocess could have terminated successfully while not all of the stdin bytes were consumed; EPIPE informs you of the latter. ---------- nosy: +pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10963> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
