On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
>> An alternative would be to keep all infrastructure up and running,
>> but that is infeasible.
>
> Or to adopt tools that help improve reliability.  I'm not convinced that the
> buildbots really do that.  A PQM-style approach, while more of a pain for
> developers because of the serialized landings, would definitely improve
> things, and there's not nearly as much infrastructure involved to keep
> humming for old releases.  PQM isn't perfect, but I do believe it would
> help.
>

What is a "PQM-style approach" to releases?

-Brett
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Reply via email to