Brett Cannon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 21:11, Mark Hammond <mhamm...@skippinet.com.au > <mailto:mhamm...@skippinet.com.au>> wrote: > But my wider point was that there doesn't seem to be a required > level of functionality, or even a blanket statement along the lines > of "native eol support must offer as much functionality as svn". > eg, what would, and would not, be considered a "deal-breaker" in > this area? Anything? > > > If windows users get screwed that's a deal breaker. I have not looked at > the line endings section of the PEP yet, though, to know if they are at > the moment.
That sounds like a "not worse than SVN" to me (which means allowing it to be set on a per-file basis, but also being able to set it up so that checked in text files were marked that way by default). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
