Mark Dickinson wrote: > Speaking as one of the people who occasionally remembers to backport > to 3.0 (though clearly I failed with r69846), it wouldn't bother me at all > if there were no 3.0.2. I can't speak for any of the other backporters, of > course. > > I'm not really sure who 3.0.2 would be useful for.
I agree with what Mark has said above (it also means I can just svn switch my 3.0 checkout to 3.1 rather than adding a 5th local working copy). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers