On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:13, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Victor Stinner wrote: > > It's look like the repository is ok. > > I confirmed this by looking at what Senthil's commit actually did on the > Python 2.6 branch - it just added some redundant info to the beginning > of the svnmerge-integrated property. > > As that redundant info is no longer present, I expect svnmerge cleared > it out on a subsequent merge command. > > I'm not sure if there should be any change in the wording of the FAQ > entry for this - maybe expanding on the last sentence a bit? > > Current: "This is a one-time operation." > Possible change: "This is a one-time operation (i.e. only when the > branch is originally created, not when each developer creates a local > checkout for the branch)." > Done. -Brett > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > --------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
