-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/06/2010 10:12 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> My original plan was to delay integration of pybsddb 5.x.x for 2.7.1 >> release > > Bugfix releases are only for bug fixes, by definition. 2.7.1 shouldn't > receive such a change.
In the past 2.6 received a small patch to be able to compile against BDB 4.8. There are other precedents. > Why should it be "transparent"? Are you so confident that it won't bring > any new problems? Given that we are talking about a new major version > number, this sounds a bit optimistic. pybsddb 5.0.0 compiles against BDB 5.0.x, but it doesn' support any new feature. The diff is pretty small, and the testsuite is very extensive. I am pretty confident. - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ . _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQCVAwUBS7udh5lgi5GaxT1NAQIbDgP/YYgQSmlme8NN2dI1mO37yEJRYMP4fBCw UvowTILx6WTwEPKPCwCry33ZN+71uIxu51W0411LEhwFxnEFCM4vQYlzkZL9Y/Ym HZuEJ2xtXj7sod6mz15Qgl3C2sv3ZfL5F3V0wio0fpdaRc4H8sAc/VD0Vzixhl9g NWKGfS/y0Wo= =KopF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
