On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > >> I too, am for MaL's suggestion that we give Eric privs, and see how it >> goes before signing off on him being the long-term maintainer, but I >> am a strong -100 on allowing distutils to fall back to the way things >> were. We need more people assigned/associated/feeling ownership of >> stdlib modules, not less. > > I agree with the last sentence. I was just trying to be prudent as to > how we handle maintenance of delicate parts of the stdlib.
If it's just the maintainer issue concerning people, perhaps think of it as Tarek deputising to Eric - and I think we should allow active maintainers of modules to deputise people that *they* trust to do a good job. +1 from me as well. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers