On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
>
>> I too, am for MaL's suggestion that we give Eric privs, and see how it
>> goes before signing off on him being the long-term maintainer, but I
>> am a strong -100 on allowing distutils to fall back to the way things
>> were. We need more people assigned/associated/feeling ownership of
>> stdlib modules, not less.
>
> I agree with the last sentence. I was just trying to be prudent as to
> how we handle maintenance of delicate parts of the stdlib.

If it's just the maintainer issue concerning people, perhaps think of
it as Tarek deputising to Eric - and I think we should allow active
maintainers of modules to deputise people that *they* trust to do a
good job.

+1 from me as well.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncogh...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Reply via email to