-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 29.01.2011 13:52, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 12:24 +0000, Vinay Sajip a écrit : >>> >>> So my "pronouncement" here is: if reviewed properly, the patch will go >>> in 3.2rc2. If this needs a few more days, so be it. And should the >>> testing after 3.2rc2 reveal deficiencies, we will fix them and put in >>> another rc. >>> >> >> +1. >> >> When we say "release candidate", surely that implies no known serious >> brokenness. Even if we have to go back to calling it beta (Marc-Andre's >> point), >> surely there's no harm in that, as long as it's made clear that it wouldn't >> be a >> free-for-all for other patches to go in? > > Okay, I don't mind if mailbox gets "fixed", but -1 on making the release > schedule any longer because of that. > OTOH, if mailbox *needs* a lengthening of the release schedule, then > it's 3.3 material (or 3.2.1, depending on the other RM's view :-)).
Not if it's a few days, otherwise I'd agree. Georg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1EI+8ACgkQN9GcIYhpnLCpqACglNZB0ZKLbif+7ruxqIRJn/63 nQkAn1wW5dm3EDNKqbrGXxbBE2w998rO =Rqgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
