-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 30.01.2011 13:52, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Georg Brandl <ge...@python.org> wrote: >>> And why it does test with and without "module". >> >> Because it always did (there's a thing called backwards compatibility.) >> >> This is of course probably the obvious one to start a deprecation process. > > But why do we check the long suffix for the *new* extension module > naming variants from PEP 3149 and PEP 384? Those are completely new, > so there's no backwards compatibility argument there.
It's for easy transition I guess -- you take the same module name and just tack on .abi3.so instead of .so. Georg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1FbB8ACgkQN9GcIYhpnLC6qwCghvhPM1bMaNgmB8SUEoe73vzV DP0AnjKDxrR6Y59uFtSRzmWA+qtvBViA =8H8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
