On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Steve Holden <st...@holdenweb.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 11:25 -0500, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : >>>>> So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that >>>>> he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. >>>>> That would also be a *solution*. >>>> >>>> Martin, why don't you implement your solution yourself, if you think the >>>> process is not a problem? That would be a good way of putting money >>>> where your mouth is. >>>> >>>> I'm obviously not going to do that work for you. I'm not paid by the PSF >>>> to solve paperwork. >>> >>> Just for the record: neither am I. However, sending an email to Ross >>> wasn't that difficult. >> >> Right, sending a mail isn't difficult. Do you volunteer to do the >> necessary work (sending emails, following up on them, etc.) each and >> every time the need for requesting and checking contributor agreements >> arises? >> >> Thank you > > Antoine: > > Your point will be more effectively made without this continual sniping at > anyone who responds to you. That wasn't intended as a serious question, was > it? UYou know Martin won't have time to do that. > > As a matter of fact, though, the PSF has an administrator who is perfectly > capable of doing just this if it's the best process we have, she just hasn't > been involved in processing new developers in the past. So Pat should > probably get involved in defining what the process is. > > Let's work towards a solution, please. > > regards > Steve
I have spoken to Van Lindberg, and he and I will be driving/discussing the best approach for electronic CLAs/signing. We will drive this on a PSF level. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
