On May 04, 2011, at 09:50 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Since 3.2.1 is the first release from Mercurial, I'm likely going to need >> extra time figure out the best process, and to go through PEP 101 and fix >> it (XXX what do we do with the SVN instructions, which are still valid >> for 2.6?). > >I would say drop them, and add a reference to the source of the last >revision that included them for Barry's benefit (although I believe >he's doing source-only security releases now, so he'll be skipping >most of them).
It's fine. When I do the source release, I can just pull up an older rev of PEP 101. BTW, I think last time we decided to do the source releases for 2.5 and 2.6 from SVN, but to also commit the changes to the hg branch. Martin is that what you did for 2.5? -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
