On Wed, Apr 25, 2012, at 03:08 PM, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Richard (sbt) has been contributing for quite some time now, as can be > > seen from (part of) its contributions below: > > > > > [snip] > > > > He writes good code, has good ideas, is reactive to comments and > > reviews, and he's actually the original multiprocessing author (and > > he's one of the few contributors competent under both Unix and > > Windows). > > > > Therefore, I think it would definitely make sense to give him commit rights. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Cheers, > > > > cf > > Uh, Wow. Yes. He should have commit rights - he was granted them when the > multiprocessing pep was approved, but then vanished for several years > (myself and others tried getting a hold of him). Lack of any contributor > agreement or response from him is actually why the header files for > multiprocessing including the specific license due to lack of contributor > agreement from him. > > He should have commit rights: In fact I'd love to talk to him offline > about where he went off to! I assumed he was gone-gone! > > Jesse
Guido mentioned him at the 2011 Language Summit as a vanished contributor that we'd really like to get an agreement from. +1 -- KBK _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers