In article <[email protected]>, Jesse Noller <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 30, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Ned Deily <[email protected]> wrote: > > In article > > <CADiSq7eqEUibMFvKjeCvH_CjvfUbd7kWKSzxG9dgUVpOxM=b...@mail.gmail.com>, > > Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Steve Holden <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Is any one person in the dev community anxious to represent that > >>> community > >>> in the (hopefully forthcoming) "new new python.org" development. Probably > >>> a > >>> good time to talk about that, as the RFP is open. > >> > >> I'd be happy to do it if nobody else volunteers. Maybe we can get some > >> RSS feeds hooked up in appropriate places :) > > > > It would be good to ensure that someone with recent experience managing > > Python releases is included in the process since the release managers > > are major content producers for python.org (i.e. the current /downloads > > section including release pages) and have their own particular needs for > > working with the web site.. > Please take a look at the RFP. It doesn't look to change the download manager > process, and in fact forces an offline working/contributor mode so this > workflow can stay close to what it is today.
Jesse, I had read it and I think it's a good RFP. Kudos to all involved. My point was to address Steve's request for "any one person in the dev community". It seemed to me that the release managers are one of the most important content producers today on the web site so perhaps one of them should be considered as that representative. But perhaps I misunderstand what Steve was suggesting. -- Ned Deily, [email protected] _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
