On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:13:13 -0700, Ned Deily <n...@acm.org> wrote:
> In article <20130330141534.44893250...@webabinitio.net>,
>  "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
> > This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a
> > security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own head).
> 
> 3.1?

Heh, silly me.  The memory is the second thing that goes.

--David
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Reply via email to