On ven., 2013-11-29 at 11:40 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > If you can get a majority of the committers to vote to ban him we > should do it -- but that's a high bar (many committers probably don't > care enough to vote).
Well, many are probably inactive enough to not even notice this discussion :-) I'm not sure about the authoritative source, but the SSH keys repository shows 178 people with access rights. The majority of them isn't probably active nowadays. Then I don't know where his behaviour is most problematic: on the tracker or the MLs? If we only ban him from the tracker, I'm afraid he'll start making "here's an issue I can't post on the tracker because I'm banned" posts on the mailing-list... Perhaps a temporary ban? There does need to be a signal sent to him. (apparently, he stopped reopening the issue when Georg told him reopening the issue would lead to loss of posting rights, which implies he is sensitive to this kind of signals) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
