In article <543ed795.3010...@jcea.es>, Jesus Cea <j...@jcea.es> wrote:
> Mercurial branches 3.1 and 2.6 are not "inactive". They are not "merged":
> 
> """
> [jcea@babylon5 cpython]$ hg branches
> default                    93408:fd658692db3a
> 2.7                        93384:7ba47bbfe38d
> 3.1                        90584:c7b93519807a
> 2.6                        90420:23a60d89dbd4
> 3.4                        93406:5fd481150b35 (inactive)
> 3.3                        93403:cda907a02a80 (inactive)
> 3.2                        93299:eac54f7a8018 (inactive)
> """
> 
> I guess they should be "merged" (or "null merged") to 2.7 and to 3.2,
> 3.3, 3.4 and default. I can do it myself, if you think it is appropiate.

Since both 2.6 and 3.1 are now retired, their branches should be marked 
as closed at this point, like earlier retired releases.  Barry?  
Benjamin?

-- 
 Ned Deily,
 n...@acm.org

_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Reply via email to