On 02/28/2016 10:25 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016, 12:02 Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net > <mailto:g.bra...@gmx.net>> wrote: > > On 02/28/2016 08:10 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > Can *anyone* take it upon themselves to (let's > > say) say "Brett, you unilaterally changed the policy with no > discussion > > or consultation and just four minutes notice. That is unspeakably > rude > > and total jerk behaviour, so under your own rules you're out of > here"? > > > > I'm not just making a rhetorical point. I wouldn't accept that sort > of > > unilateral behaviour from my work colleagues. > > > > > > It wasn't a unilateral decision. If it was then I would have just done > it > > without opening an issue or bringing it up here. I mentioned it here > just in > > case someone might get upset by it (which obviously happened). > > FWIW, Eric Smith and myself (co-"owners" of the mailing list) supported > this > when Brett asked. > > > I think Steven's objection was me wanting to state in the devguide that core > devs would adhere to the CoC in all Python-related interactions in the > community > regardless of whether that interaction explicitly occurred under the purview > of > the CoC, which is a stronger statement than just this mailing list being under > the CoC.
Well, "Python-related" is a bit strong and includes activities the PSF/the CPython developer community has no business in. It should be rephrased to "Python core-related" - that mostly happens through the mailing lists (and the tracker). We should not presume to be an employer that will fire employees based on a post on their private Facebook account. cheers, Georg _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
