On 2 May 2018 at 19:49, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment > Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the > talk at the Language Summit: > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/ > > The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices: > > * +1: you like the PEP > * -1: you dislike the PEP > * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon > * don't reply to this poll :-) >
-1 from me (on "too much pain for not enough gain" grounds). Regards, Nick. P.S. I quite liked the initial "expr as name" version with subscopes, but those aspects were changed based on reasonable concerns raised on python-ideas, and I think the discussion of the simplified proposal on python-dev has also raised sufficient further concerns to push the whole concept back into python-ideas territory. (I do think the discussions have clarified the nature of the cases where the current lack of any form of inline binding support can be genuinely irritating, though) -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
