On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 11:28 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
> > Le 12/07/2018 à 20:22, Doug Hellmann a écrit : > > Excerpts from Brett Cannon's message of 2018-07-12 11:11:49 -0700: > >> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 11:02 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> IOW I don't see anyone (or some group of 3) who is as well-versed in > >>> everything on Guido's level. That can be solved if Guido agrees to > >>> join the permanent N-virate though :) > >>> > >> > >> No one has suggested we haven't been extremely lucky for the past 28 > years. > >> :) I also don't think we will reach perfection in any solution anyway > and > >> this is somewhat of a "least bad" situation. > > > > Are we looking for people who are skilled at language design, or who are > > skilled at building consensus through open decision-making processes? > > Because those are very different sorts of skills, and if this new body > > is intended to only be a final arbiter on decisions the former set of > > skills may be less important than the latter. > > IMHO the N-virate should primarily be responsible for delegation. > > Side note: I think we'll be talking less and less about language design, > and instead about library and infrastructure design. > Same here. I suspect this will make us much more conservative in accepting language changes compared to e.g. what our deprecation policy should be.
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/