Le mar. 12 févr. 2019 à 15:07, Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rod...@gmail.com> a écrit : > IMO since the people who are gonna use these communication channels are > mostly gonna be core developers (or is Users category also included in the > migration plan?) I think the council should take into account how core-devs > feel about this first. Opinions may have changed over the course of the last > 3 months, but there was a poll back in November showing how many of us were > not happy to abandon the mailing lists: > https://discuss.python.org/t/how-do-you-find-discourse-so-far/429 > ...and that does not include the 24 core devs who never joined discuss. So at > the very least I would appreciate having a new poll to understand whether/how > things changed in the meantime. FWIW my main concern about discuss remains > the long term archival topic described here: > https://discuss.python.org/t/discourse-archive-and-backup/637
I like Barry's idea of a PEP since the points that you listed here have already been discussed multiple times. We need a document (a PEP) which summarize these discussions and maybe list things that you should fixed between we can abandon a mailing list for python-committers (for example). I'm not volunteer to write such PEP. Maybe early supporters of Discourse like Lukasz, Pablo and Yury are more interested to write such PEP? Anyone else? Note: I changed my mind on Discourse since discuss.python.org has been created :-) It took me time to be used to it. First, I was opposed since I'm always opposed to changes by default :-) Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
