Jim Gallacher wrote .. > Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > Thus, trade off of speed versus correctness is probably reasonable as > it > > will > > not cause a failure. In general I tend towards robustness and unexpected > > surprises and that is why the code was written as it was. > > Personally I tend towards robustness and *away* from unexpected > suprises, but if that's what it takes to keep your life interesting who > am I to argue? :)
Not not not again. I'm not doing very well at getting my "not" and "un" around the right way of late am I. It is a problem I always have, but that is twice now in the last day. :-( Graham
