Nicolas Lehuen wrote ..
> OK so my core group vote is +1 for this release.
> 
> It has been tested on a wide array of OSes, both threaded and forked
> MPMs, Python 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, so I guess it's okay. A threaded test
> on MacOSX and Solaris would have been great but maybe the recommended
> MPM on those platform is the forked one, so we don't have to worry
> about those.

My vote is redundant again, but I can add one of the configurations
that Nicolas wanted to see:

  +1 MacOSX 10.3.9 PPC, Apache-2.0.55-worker, Python-2.3

I'll also say +1 as core group vote. This means all 4 have voted
as +1 and no need to wait 72 hours now to see if I would veto it.
I'm too busy anyway, finding new features/improvements to add
to JIRA, to look at 3.2.7 in particular to find bugs. ;-)

Graham

> Regards,
> Nicolas
> 
> 2006/2/7, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we have enough +1's. (If someone could tally them up in a single
> > > e-mail, that'd be great.) Should we start a core-group vote, or wait
> > > some more? On the bash issue - I think we can leave it as is, the
> > > affected distros will just have to maintain a patch in their build
> systems.
> >
> > Let's vote.
> >
> > Here is the test summary:
> >
> > +1 Debian (sid), Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.3.5
> > +1 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-worker, Python 2.3.5
> > +1 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-prefork, Python 2.3.5
> > +1 Debian (testing, aka, etch), Apache 2.0.55-worker, Python 2.3.5
> > +1 Fedora Core 4, Linux 2.6.15, Apache 2.0.54, Python 2.4.1
> > +1 FreeBSD 4.9 , Apache 2.0.50 (prefork), Python 2.3.4
> > +1 FreeBSD 4.9 , Apache 2.0.55 (prefork), Python 2.4.2
> > +1 MacOSX 10.4.4 PPC, Apache-2.0.55-prefork, Python-2.4.2
> > +1 Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4
> > +1 Solaris 10 Sparc, Apache-2.0.55-prefork, Python-2.4.2
> > +1 Ubuntu 5.10 Breezy (amd64), Apache 2.0.54-worker, Python 2.4.2
> > +1 Windows 2000 SP4, Apache/2.0.55 + Python/2.2.3
> > +1 Windows 2000 SP4, Apache/2.0.55 + ActivePython/2.3.5
> > +1 Windows XP SP2, Apache/2.0.55 + ActivePython/2.4.2
> >
> > With configure fixed manually to deal with bash bug:
> > +1 Gentoo 2005.1 (amd64), Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.4.2
> >
> > Plus we have the following tests from the svn revision which corresponds
> > to 3.2.7:
> > +1 trunk rev 374709 FreeBSD 6.0 Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.4.2
> >
> > Jim
> >

Reply via email to