[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-184?page=comments#action_12447665
]
Alexis Marrero commented on MODPYTHON-184:
------------------------------------------
[[ Old comment, sent by email on Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:54:50 -0400 ]]
Jim,
This are my results for the memory leak search in apache.table().
The table object creates a memory pool by using apr_pool_create_ex()
and destroys the pool using apr_pool_destroy(). I added a line in
MpTable_New() before "return (PyObject*)t" to destroy the pool and
ran 1M iterations and I notice that there was no memory leak.
Therefore the apache functions seems to be working fine.
I couldn't fix the problem but here is a work around. In mod_python/
util.py instead of using apache.make_table() use a regular Python
dictionary. So the line that looks like:
headers = apache.make_table()
now looks like:
headers = {}
The apache table is basically used a Python dictionary. The only
functionality that is lost is that apache tables are case
insensitive, and that can be easily fixed by creating a class in
Python that inherits from dict type and override the __getitem__ and
__setitem__ methods.
For the moment I'm going to keep this changes until modpython.org
release a patch. I spent quite sometime trying to investigate and
solve the memory leak problem but the best I was able to do was to
work around it.
BTW, apache.table, apache.make_table or _apache.table is only being
used in mod_python/util.py.
/amn
> Memory leak apache.table()
> --------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-184
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-184
> Project: mod_python
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 3.3, 3.2.10
> Reporter: Jim Gallacher
> Assigned To: Jim Gallacher
> Fix For: 3.3
>
> Attachments: MP184-2006-08-25-grahamd-1.diff
>
>
> There is a memory leak in apache.table().
> from mod_python import apache
> def handler(req):
> req.content_type = 'text/plain'
> t = apache.make_table()
> req.write('ok table:')
> return apache.OK
> Using mpm-worker with StartServers 2, and 20000 requests results in memory
> consumption going from 1.2% to 9.3% per process. (ie approx 8k per request)
> This will have an impact on FieldStorage which makes use of
> apache.make_table(), which is the deprecated name for apache.table()
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
