"Martin v. L�wis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anthony Baxter wrote:
>> The library docs for, e.g. xmllib already say deprecated at the top - maybe
>> it should be larger?
>
> I think it would be better to *remove* the xmllib documentation.
> Existing code which needs the module will continue to work even
> without documentation, and new code is unlikely to be written for
> a module that has no documentation, and where importing the module
> gives a DeprecationWarning.
+1, at least for *hiding* the documentation of xmllib + similar
modules. I'm not sure wholesale removal is really a good idea.
It's like the new "Non-essential Built-in Functions" section of the
lib ref.
Cheers,
mwh
--
<Acapnotic> jemfinch: What's to parse? A numeric code, perhaps a
chicken, and some arguments
-- from Twisted.Quotes
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
