"Phillip J. Eby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 08:20 PM 2/9/05 +0100, BJ�rn Lindqvist wrote:
>>Does Skip's idea have
>>any merit?
>
> Yes, but not as a default behavior. Many people already consider the
> fact that tracebacks display file paths to be a potential security
> problem. If anything, the default traceback display should have less
> information, not more. (E.g., display module __name__ instead of the
> code's __file__).
Oh, come on. Making tracebacks less useful to protect people who
accidentally spray them across the internet seems absurd. Would you
like them not to show source, either?
Cheers,
mwh
--
Many of the posts you see on Usenet are actually from moths. You
can tell which posters they are by their attraction to the flames.
-- Internet Oracularity #1279-06
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
