Tim Peters wrote:
Looks right to me -- cool!  I never used struct's 'P' format because
it always appeared useless to me:    But silly me!  I'm sure Guido
put it there anticipating the need for calcsize('P') when making a
positive_id() function in Python.

Smells like more time machine activity to me. Any minute now you'll find there's suddenly a positive_id() builtin that's been there ever since 1.3 or so. And the 'P' format, then always never having just become useful, will have unappeared...

--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,          | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a       |
Christchurch, New Zealand          | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          +--------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to