Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Nicolas Fleury]
> > I would prefer something that would be
> > understandable for a newbie's eyes, even if it fits more with common
> > usage than with the real semantics behind it. For example a Boost-like
> > keyword like:
> >
> > scoped EXPR as VAR:
> > BLOCK
>
> Definitely not. In too many languages, a "scope" is a new namespace,
> and that's exactly what a block (by whichever name) is *not*.
scopeless, unscoped, Scope(tm) (we would be required to use the unicode
trademark symbol, of course)...
It's way too long, and is too close to a pre-existing keyword, but I
think 'finalized' is descriptive. But...
finalize EXPR as VAR:
BLOCK
That reads nice... Maybe even 'cleanup', or
'finalize_after_iteration_without_iter_call' (abbreviated to 'faiwic',
of course). <1.0 wink>
All right, it's late enough. Enough 'ideas' from me tonight.
- Josiah
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
