[Michael Spencer] > I don't know whether it's true for all the PEP 340 use cases, but the all the > current examples would read very naturally if the block-template could be > specified in an extended try statement:
Sorry, this emphasizes the wrong thing. A try-statement emphasizes that the body may fail (and then provides some cleanup semantics). IMO a block-statement, while it has cleanup semantics, should emphasize that the block executes under some kind of supervision. The more I think about it the more I like having no keyword at all (see other messages). -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
