Jp Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If such a construct is to be introduced, the ideal spelling would seem to
> be:
>
> for [VAR in] EXPR:
> BLOCK1
> finally:
> BLOCK2
Does this mean that adding
finally:
pass
to a for block would make the for loop behave differently?
Cheers,
mwh
--
I really hope there's a catastrophic bug in some future e-mail
program where if you try and send an attachment it cancels your
ISP account, deletes your harddrive, and pisses in your coffee
-- Adam Rixey
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
