[Greg Ewing] > -0.7 on directly giving generators do-protocol methods. I'm -1 on this myself.
> I'm not yet convinced that encouraging people to use > generators to implement block controllers is a good > idea. If we blur the distinction too much at this > stage, we may regret it later if we come up with a > better idea. Also I don't see that people will be > writing block controllers anywhere near as often as > iterators, so writing classes for them isn't going to > be a big chore. And people can always use a > do-protocol-to-generator adaptor if they really want. Right. I'm +0 on adding a standard module defining a do_template decorator that turns a degenerate generator into a do-statement controller. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
