> - was, under the covers, a (optential) looping construct. This > + was, under the covers, a (potential) looping construct. This
I'm glad I didn't fix this one. I thought he meant to use "optional". Raymond Hettinger _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
