> > So at this point it seems your proposal is just nailing down specifics > for > > the open parts of PEP 325. > > Or PEP 288? That has throw() (albeit with a different signature). I > could do without the attributes though (PEP 342 provides a much better > solution IMO). > > If either of those PEP authors feels like updating their PEP, they > have my blessings! I probably won't get to writing my own for a few > more days.
Okay, I volunteer to recast PEP 288 to encompass your combined proposal. Will tackle it in the morning. Raymond _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
