On 26-jun-2005, at 11:34, Adam Olsen wrote:
> > To resolve these problems I propose adding lightweight cooperative > threads to Python. They can be built around a Frame object, > suspending > and resuming like generators do. > > That much is quite easy. Avoiding the C stack is a bit harder. > However, it can be done if we introduce a new operator for threaded > calls (which I refer to as non-atomic calls), which I propose be > "func@()". As a bonus this prevents any operation which doesn't use > the non-atomic call syntax from triggering a thread switch > accidentally. Have a look at stackless python. http://www.stackless.com/ Ronald _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
