Paul Moore wrote: > On 7/6/05, Michael Chermside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Paul Moore writes: >> > I also like the fact that it offers a neat 1-word name for the >> > generator decorator, "@context". >> >> Well, ok... does anyone *else* agree? I too saw this and thought "neat! >> a simple one-word name!". But then I started worrying that it's not >> defining the *context*, but rather the *context manager*. While >> "context manager" is a term I could easily imagine associating only >> with 'with' statements, "context" is too general a term... even after >> Python supports 'with' statements I will continue to use "context" >> to mean lots of different things (eg: decimal.context). > > Actually, you're starting to persuade me... Although I generally > prefer decorator names which are single words. Along with the at-sign, > underscores make the whole thing look a little too "punctuation-heavy" > for me (and don't suggest camel case, please!).
Anything against @contextmanager in analogy to @staticmethod ? Reinhold -- Mail address is perfectly valid! _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
