On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 07:41:06PM +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Christoph Ludwig wrote: > > My point is: The test implemented in the 2.4.1 configure script gives a > > wrong > > result if your platform happens to be x86 Linux with ELF binaries and > > g++ 4.0. [...] > > But I digress. It's not that important for our discussion whether a C++ > > compiler must / should / is allowed to add exception handling code to the > > call of an extern "C" function. The point is that some do *unless* they see > > the function definition. I contend the test involving two TUs matches more > > closely the situation with ccpython.cc than the current test. > > Maybe. For Python 2.4, feel free to contribute a more complex test. For > Python 2.5, I would prefer if the entire code around ccpython.cc was > removed.
I submitted patch #1239112 that implements the test involving two TUs for Python 2.4. I plan to work on a more comprehensive patch for Python 2.5 but that will take some time. Regards Christoph -- http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/cludwig.html LiDIA: http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/LiDIA/Welcome.html _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com