I don't remember where I read (here around probably) that having a "client pluggable" syntax was not good for python because then ,and more blah blah.I believed it was a rule of the thumb.. But ,when a client programmer like me writes code he tries to give a clean, unambigous interface/syntax for a possible under user.Having a fixed set of keywords and not overridable syntactic sugar is just a limit.Once a sound set of unittest is written with documentation, every useful library would add its keywords. What I start thinking reading here is that if you let redefine, instead:
1) print statement :I will redefine it like now , no matter if python 3.0 is not selling it any more in the language 2) on A take B or C: How ever and whatever one would like to write, this expression could be definable, ending all the pathetic blah blah (hope not to offend) Thanks for jour job anyway. Paolino _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
